Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1067 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1067 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved. Concurrent findings of courts below upheld that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and suit was barred by limitation under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Smt. Doshmani w/o. Vasantlal Bahoria, filed a Second Appeal against the judgment and order dated 26.4.2007 passed by the Adhoc District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Minister Exceeded Powers by Exercising Authority After Possession Was Taken and Title Vested in State.

The petitioner, Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority, established under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 for developing a n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Settlement for Independent Slum Development by Three Societies. Fabricated Withdrawal of Consent Rejected; SRA's Settlement Terms Allowed to End 14-Year Litigation.

The Supreme Court disposed of two Special Leave Petitions challenging a Bombay High Court order that had rejected writ petitions filed by Adarsh Estat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Unilateral Assignment of Leasehold Rights – Res Judicata Bars Fresh Application Without Resolving Legal Complications. Finality of Quasi-Judicial Orders Upheld – Liberty to Reapply Only After Civil Court Resolution

Res Judicata Applicability – Principles of res judicata apply to quasi-judicial authorities. A Competent Authority’s findings bind parties unle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Recording Exemption Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 set aside as it was made without notice to petitioners and without application of mind.

The petitioners, Bombay Fibre Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its director Amit Kothari, filed a writ petition challenging Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against State Agency for Exceeding 20% Limit Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Recovery of Rs.16,95,48,869/- for multiple assessment years held illegal as it exceeded the statutory limit of 20% pending appeal.

The petitioner, Bidar Nirmiti Kendra, an agency of the State Government, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...