Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Recording Exemption Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 set aside as it was made without notice to petitioners and without application of mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Bombay Fibre Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its director Amit Kothari, filed a writ petition challenging Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 made in the revenue records of land bearing Gat Nos. 1-1/B, 1/6A, 1/6B and 1/7 of village Manpada, district Thane, admeasuring about 34664 sq. mtrs. The mutation entry recorded that the land was subject to exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976. The petitioners contended that the mutation entry was made without any notice to them and without any application of mind by the revenue authorities. They argued that they were the owners of the land and that the entry adversely affected their rights. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and various revenue officers, opposed the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the mutation entry was indeed made without notice to the petitioners and without any application of mind. The court held that such an entry cannot be sustained and set it aside. The court further directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' objections and pass appropriate orders after giving them an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Mutation Entry - Notice - The mutation entry recording exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 was made without notice to the petitioners, who were the owners of the land, and without any application of mind by the revenue authorities. The court held that such an entry cannot be sustained and set it aside. (Paras 1-15)

B) Urban Land Ceiling - Exemption - Revenue Records - The exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 cannot be recorded in revenue records without a proper inquiry and without giving an opportunity of hearing to the affected parties. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' objections and pass appropriate orders after hearing them. (Paras 1-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 recording exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 in respect of the petitioners' land was validly made without notice to the petitioners and without application of mind by the revenue authorities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 is set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioners' objections and pass appropriate orders after giving them an opportunity of hearing. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Mutation entry cannot be made without notice to affected parties
  • Mutation entry must be based on application of mind by revenue authorities
  • Exemption under Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act
  • 1976 cannot be recorded in revenue records without proper inquiry
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (11) 105

Writ Petition No. 9691 of 2016

2017-11-16

Anoop V. Mohta, Manish Pitale

Mr. Milind Sathe /w Rajesh Satpalkar, Ms. Paka i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for the Petitioners. Ms. Jyoti Jadhav, AGP for the Respondents.

Bombay Fibre Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Amit Kothari

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a mutation entry in revenue records.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought setting aside of Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 and direction to respondents to consider their objections.

Filing Reason

Mutation Entry No. 813 was made without notice to the petitioners and without application of mind, recording exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 on their land.

Issues

Whether Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 was validly made without notice to the petitioners? Whether the revenue authorities applied their mind before making the mutation entry?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the mutation entry was made without notice to them and without application of mind, adversely affecting their rights as owners. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found no merit in their opposition.

Ratio Decidendi

A mutation entry in revenue records cannot be made without notice to the affected parties and without application of mind by the revenue authorities. Such an entry is liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

The grievance raised in this petition is in respect of Mutation Entry No. 813, dated 25th May, 2009 wherein it has been recorded that land bearing Gat Nos. 1-1/B, 1/6A, 1/6B and 1/7 of village Manpada, district Thane, admeasuring about 34664 sq. mtrs. is subject to exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976. The mutation entry was made without any notice to the petitioners and without any application of mind by the revenue authorities.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 9691 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court challenging Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009. The petition was heard on 13th November 2017 and judgment was pronounced on 16th November 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Recording Exemption Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Mutation Entry No. 813 dated 25th May 2009 set aside as it was made without notice to petitioners and without application of mind.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 256 CrPC for Complainant's Absence in Defamation Case. The court restored the complaint to the trial court, emphasizing the need for an opportunity to be heard before acquittal under Sec...