Search Results for "Equitable balance"

1116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Restoration of Land to Tenant. Delay of 34 Years in Filing Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, Condonation Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Debashish Devnarayan Ghosh, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revenue Minister of Maharashtra and the Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain Advocate General from Hoisting National Flag. Petitioner lacked locus standi as no legal right or public interest was involved.

The petitioner, H.R. Vishwanath, an advocate appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute pertains to a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellant, Smt H ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Senior Bailiff in Service Matter Due to Departmental Error. Recovery of Excess Salary for 29-Year Period Set Aside as No Misrepresentation Shown, Causing Extreme Hardship Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, who was appointed as a Senior Bailiff in 1993, received an Official Memorandum dated 09.06.2022 from the 6th respondent stating that h...