Search Results for "oral intimation"

1316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Discharge of Accused in D.Ed. College Cheating Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cheating Under Sections 418 and 420 IPC. Running an Unauthorised College Without Permission Does Not Constitute Cheating Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal revision application challenging an order dated 10th April 1992 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Clas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Dividing Sample Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector M.M. Acharya, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 11/8/1992 passed by the Judicial M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.

The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Unexplained Delay in Sending Sample. Delay of 61 days in sending sample to Public Analyst under Rule 7(3) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, entitles accused to benefit of doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 6/3/1992 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 46th Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and No Prior Notice Required.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and Not on Private Land.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff in a suit against the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). He resided and ran a b...