Search Results for "consent irrelevant"

1433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Consortium Bid — Bid Rejection Upheld as Consortium Agreement Did Not Designate Petitioner as Prime Member

The petitioner, M/s. Bee Jay Contractors, a registered partnership firm, formed a consortium with M/s. Brij Gopal Construction Company to bid for a te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Promotion of Respondent No.5 in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Ultra Vires Action. Promotion of A.T. Shintre as Director under Section 54A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 set aside for being illegal and arbitrary.

The petitioners, employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compassionate Appointment Order Due to Non-Existent Vacancy and Lack of Statutory Scheme. Director's Approval for Appointment of Widow as Peon Set Aside as No Vacancy Existed and No Compensatory Appointment Policy Governed Aided Colleges.

The petitioners, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Karmaveer Mahavidyalaya, Mul, challenged an order dated 7.3.2007 passed by the Director of Higher Educat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...