Search Results for "block period"

3142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. The court held that failure to notify SOTTO and create transparent waiting lists violates the Act and Rules, affecting the right to health of patients.

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by The Mango Foundation (TMF), a registered non-profit organization,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. Court Orders Creation of Transparent Waiting Lists, Retrieval Teams, and Dedicated Website for Organ Transplantation in Public Interest.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by The Mango Foundation, a registered non-profit organization, seeking enforcement of the Transplantation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit — Upholds Right of Heirs to Seek Impleadment Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC. Court holds that abatement of suit against deceased defendant does not automatically bar substitution of legal representatives if application is made within limitation.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against several defendants, including Balbhim Govind Deshpande (origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Title Held Void.

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants-original plaintiffs challenging the judgme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Agreement to Sell. Trial court's finding that no agreement was executed and no advance paid upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...