Search Results for "Status Quo Order"

1733 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1733 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Proceedings for Breach of Injunction Against Subsequent Purchaser. Order 39 Rule 2A CPC applies to parties added after injunction order if they have knowledge of it.

The case arises from a civil suit (Regular CS No. 21 of 2001) filed by respondents no. 2 and 3 (original plaintiffs) seeking injunction against defend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Suit Without Notice to Intervenors, Sets Aside Order for Costs. The court held that intervenors added as defendants have a right to be heard before withdrawal of suit under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.

The case involves a civil suit filed by respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) before the City Civil Court, being Long Cause Suit No.2830 of 2002, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Head Constables in Promotion Dispute — Rules 2010 Notified After Vacancy Cannot Deny Promotion. Educational Qualification for Promotion to ASI-Executive Must Be Possessed at Time of Promotion, Not Initial Appointment, Under 2008 Rules and Standing Order.

The case involves a dispute among Head Constables of the Andaman & Nicobar Police Department regarding promotion to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspecto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KAT Order in Land Regularization Case. Court upholds regularization of unauthorized occupation under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, finding no error in Tribunal's order.

The State of Karnataka, along with the Deputy Commissioner and Tahsildar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...