Search Results for "government directions"

8330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Complaint Against BSNL Employee for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Accused's Official Capacity Acts as Bar to Prosecution Without Prior Government Approval.

The case involves a private complaint filed by Ramesh Tukaram Diwate (complainant) against Padmakar Gajananrao Pande (accused) under Section 500 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Re-Hearing in PIL on Park Land Encroachment Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Undertakings Recorded for Park Development and Slum Rehabilitation Under Karnataka Slum Areas Act; Review Petitions Allowed, Matter Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, a federation of residents' welfare associations, filed a public interest litigation in 2006 alleging encroachment on approximately 3 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging POTA Sanction and Review Committee's Confirmation. Court upholds validity of sanction under Section 45 of POTA and affirms that POTA Review Committee has jurisdiction to confirm or revoke sanction under Section 60 of POTA.

The petitioners, who were accused in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevent...