Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

2003 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2003 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Invalid. ITAT Correctly Held That Reassessment Under Section 147 Was Not Justified as There Was No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The case involves a tax appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the cancel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Eviction Suit — Failure of Counsel to Appear Not to Prejudice Litigant's Rights Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Tenants' Diligence and Sufficient Cause Established Despite Counsel's Negligence.

The petitioners, Umar Abdul Majid Khan (original tenant) and Abdul Malik Shaikh (alleged sub-tenant), filed a writ petition challenging the orders of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligations Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC Without Proof of Fraudulent Intent at Inception.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by V.B. Padode and M/s. Dataline and Research Technologies (I) Ltd. (the petitioners) challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. Sale Deed of 1960 Validated by Possession and Tax Payments Despite Lack of Registration Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant, Barku s/o Dago Uke, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration of Measurement Evidence. Court holds that the lower appellate court failed to consider the TILR's map and report, which constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession of encroached land. The appellants, original plaintiffs, are members of a joint family own...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Family Settlement Capital Gains Case — Reopening Under Section 147/148 Invalid Due to Change of Opinion and Limitation. Consent Decree Approved by Civil Court Held to Be a Bona Fide Family Arrangement Not Attracting Capital Gains Tax.

The case involves a tax appeal by the Power of Attorney holder of Lorna Margaret Pinto, a Non-Resident Indian, against the Assistant Commissioner of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Adoption Dispute — Holds Adoption Valid Despite Caste Allegations. Court finds that adoption of a daughter's son by a widow is valid under Hindu law and that the parties were not 96 Kuli Marathas, thus no prohibition applied.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a judgment in two suits concerning the validity of an adoption. The appellants, Baburao Marutrao Man...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Subletting and Nuisance. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts under Bombay Rent Act upheld as not perverse.

The petitioners, Chellaram Jethanand Madhrani and Purushottam Jethanand Madhrani, were tenants of a premises owned by the respondent, Maruti Raghunath...