Search Results for "additional fee"

1959 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1959 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Inam Land Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Succeeds as Plaintiffs Prove Their Father Was Granted Inam Land and They Are in Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Challenge to Selection List for Assistant Surgeon (General) Recruitment. Petitioner Alleges Incorrect Evaluation of Exam Answers and Seeks Mandamus to Award Additional Marks.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, N. Karthika, challenging the provisional selection list ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicated Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute. The Award Held Lessee Liable for Tax Demands Arising from Disallowance of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The matter pertains to an arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicatur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudges Two Petitions Challenging Collector's Order Forfeiting Reclamation Lease and Imposing Payment Conditions. Petitions Examine Validity of Forfeiture and Entitlement to Regularization Under Rule 40 of Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921.

Two writ petitions, WP No. 7104 of 2002 by M/s Baf-Hira Builders Private Limited and WP No. 2004 of 2015 by Eric Anselem Mendes and Austin Gabriel Men...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Retail Outlet Dealership Selection by Indian Oil Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Violation of Selection Criteria Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Anita Sidram Koli, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (Indian Oil Corpora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Part, Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay and Recover. Deceased aged 35, self-employed, entitled to 40% future prospects; loss of consortium enhanced to Rs.40,000 per claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and children of Binod Pande, who died in a vehicular accident on 28th August 2012. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...