Search Results for "Compensation Officer"

4885 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4885 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Officer's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.5,75,000 to Rs.8,00,000 per Acre Based on Comparable Sale Deed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the Upper Krishna Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Enhanced to Rs. 15,000 per Hectare. Court Relies on Comparable Sale Deeds and Potentiality of Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Satish Gulabchand Malpani, owned agricultural land in village Jamnaik, Yavatmal. The respondents acquired 8 acres and 34 gunthas from S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition reference. The claimant, Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, owned land in Survey No.48/B admea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowner's Writ Petition Against Bank's Claim Over Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Charge on Acquired Land. Bank's Charge on Land Under Acquisition Made It an Interested Person Eligible to Claim Apportionment of Compensation Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Damu Patil, owned agricultural land in Dhule, which was acquired for the Lower Tapi Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...