Search Results for "writ petition Article 227"

4287 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4287 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minister’s Recall Order in Revenue Record Deletion Case Involving Devasthan Property. Recall Held Valid as Procedural Review to Correct Breach of Natural Justice, and Writ Relief Declined to Prevent Injustice.

The writ petition challenged an order of the Minister (Revenue) recalling an earlier order that had deleted the remark 'Devasthan Inam Warag III' from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Refusal to Release Fixed Deposits Pending Civil Suit — Bank's Obligation to Act on Court Order Not on Private Letters

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Shetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petitions in Leave and Licence Dispute, Upholds Finding of Tenancy. Agreement styled as 'conducting business' held to be a colourable document creating landlord-tenant relationship under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The dispute pertains to a suit property, a shed admeasuring 7 x 17 feet, owned by the respondent/landlord. The respondent claimed that by an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...