Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Verification of Electronic Voting Machine in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute. Court holds that the trial court's order rejecting the application for calling EVM for verification and recounting does not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present writ petition arises out of an election petition filed by respondent No.1 under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958, challenging the declaration of the petitioner as the successful candidate in the Gram Panchayat election held on 06-08-2015. During the proceedings, the petitioner filed an application (Exhibit No.90) seeking to call for the electronic voting machine (EVM) for verification and counting of votes. The trial court rejected this application by the impugned order. The petitioner then approached the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court noted that the lis was between the petitioner and respondent No.1, with respondent Nos.2 to 7 being formal parties. The court observed that the trial court's order was not perverse or without jurisdiction, and therefore, no interference was warranted. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Gram Panchayat Election - Verification of Electronic Voting Machine - Section 15 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - The petitioner sought verification and recounting of votes from the EVM in an election petition challenging the declaration of the successful candidate. The trial court rejected the application. The High Court, in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227, declined to interfere, holding that the order was not perverse or without jurisdiction. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court's order rejecting the application for calling the electronic voting machine for verification and counting of votes is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the trial court's order was not perverse or without jurisdiction, and no interference under Article 227 was warranted. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Election petition
  • Electronic voting machine
  • Verification and recounting
  • Interference under Article 227
  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
  • 1958
  • Section 15
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (08) 184

Writ Petition No.3702 of 2016

2016-08-03

Z.A. Haq, J.

Shri S.D. Chopde for the petitioner, Shri R.L. Khapre for the respondent No.1

Sau. Amrapali Jeevan Gawai

Sau. Vaishali Sumedh Shirsat and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order rejecting application for verification of electronic voting machine in an election petition.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to call for the electronic voting machine for verification and counting of votes.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the application for verification of EVM.

Previous Decisions

The trial court rejected the application (Exhibit No.90) by the impugned order.

Issues

Whether the trial court's order rejecting the application for calling the electronic voting machine for verification and counting of votes is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the EVM should be called for verification and recounting. The respondent No.1 opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court declined to interfere under Article 227 as the trial court's order rejecting the application for verification of EVM was not perverse or without jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned trial Judge has rejected this application by the impugned order. Considering the nature of dispute, the petition is taken up for final disposal without issuing notices to the respondent Nos.2 to 7.

Procedural History

Respondent No.1 filed an election petition under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958, challenging the declaration of the petitioner as successful candidate. During the proceedings, the petitioner filed an application (Exhibit No.90) for verification of EVM, which was rejected by the trial court. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition under Article 227.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958: Section 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Verification of Electronic Voting Machine in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute. Court holds that the trial court's order rejecting the application for calling EVM for verific...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Favour of Confirming Bank in Letter of Credit Dispute. Confirming Bank's Right to Recover from Issuing Bank Upheld Despite Allegations of Fraud in Underlying Transaction.