Search Results for "fresh notification"

2769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Order Appointing Administrator under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners Contend Registrar Failed to Exhaust Options of Internal Management and Erroneously Declared Committee Inoperative Due to Invalid Co-option.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 1 July 2025 of the Minister of Co-op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Kerala General Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Over Approval Date Interpretation. Exemption Period for 100% Export-Oriented Unit Held to Commence from Date of Unambiguous Central Government Approval (27.10.1994) Under SRO 1727/1993, Not from Production Start Date.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the interpretation of an exemption notification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The dispute inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute: Oxygen Used in Steel Manufacturing Held Not 'Raw Material' for Concessional Tax Rate. Court Restores Assessment Order Levying 3% Tax on Oxygen Sold to Tata Steel Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bihar Finance Act, 1981.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had held that o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Restores Reference Court's Compensation with 10% Development Deduction for Hiwra Dam Project. The Court held that for irrigation projects, development deduction should be minimal and unrebutted expert valuation evidence must be considered.

The appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hiwra Dam project in Maharashtra. The appellant and respondents No.2 and 3 owned a partner...