Search Results for "asset"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "asset"

1400 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1400 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Enforcement Directorate's Appeal in PMLA Asset Attachment Case — Appellate Tribunal's Order Quashing Provisional Attachment Upheld Due to Lack of Scheduled Offence Link. The Court held that the Directorate of Enforcement failed to establish that the attached property was proceeds of crime derived from a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, as the predicate offence was not committed by the respondent company.

25 Sep 2025

The Directorate of Enforcement (appellant) filed a Miscellaneous Second Appeal under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Quashes Commercial Court Order Rejecting IA for Production of Documents. Court Holds That Production of Documents Under Order XI Rule 12 CPC Cannot Be Denied on Grounds of Relevance at the Stage of Filing IA.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, The Karnataka Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against AAIFR Order Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred Under Section 25 of SICA. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Appeal Under Section 25 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

8 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Iccon Oil & Specialities Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 January 2008 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Assessing Officer's Order Not Erroneous Under Section 263. Commissioner Cannot Substitute View Where Assessing Officer Applied Mind and Took Plausible View on Depreciation of Current Investments by Bank.

26 Feb 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15 January 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.

8 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in BIFR Proceedings — Sale Under Securitisation Act Completed, No Jurisdiction Remains with BIFR. The court held that once action under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation Act is taken to its logical end, BIFR loses jurisdiction, and interim relief cannot be granted to disturb a concluded sale.

19 May 2010

The petitioner, Nouveaw Exports Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.

7 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

5 Aug 2010

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Matter Against Sugar Factory for Recovery of Salary and Benefits. Appellant entitled to difference of salary, leave salary, unpaid salary, annual increments, provident fund, and gratuity as per the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 and the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

28 Sep 2010

The appellant, Ganesh Raghunath Mamidwar, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.3,73,266/- against the respondents, Devgiri Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and...

100 101 102 103 104

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)