Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against AAIFR Order Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred Under Section 25 of SICA. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Appeal Under Section 25 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Iccon Oil & Specialities Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 January 2008 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR). The AAIFR had dismissed the petitioner's appeal against an order of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) dated 21 December 2005 on the ground that the appeal was hopelessly barred by limitation. The appeal was filed beyond the period of 45 days prescribed under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA). The petitioner contended that the AAIFR had the power to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The High Court, after considering the provisions of Section 25 of SICA, held that the period of 45 days is mandatory and that the legislature intended to exclude the application of the Limitation Act. The court observed that Section 25 of SICA is a complete code and does not confer any power on the AAIFR to condone delay beyond the prescribed period. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the AAIFR's order.

Headnote

A) Limitation - Appeal under Section 25 of SICA - Mandatory Period - The period of 45 days prescribed under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 for filing an appeal before the AAIFR is mandatory and cannot be extended by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appeal filed beyond 45 days is liable to be dismissed as time-barred. (Paras 2-4)

B) Interpretation of Statutes - Exclusion of Limitation Act - Section 25 of SICA - The provisions of Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 are a complete code and exclude the application of the Limitation Act, 1963. The legislature intended that no appeal shall be entertained after the expiry of 45 days. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) has the power to condone delay in filing an appeal beyond the period of 45 days prescribed under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. The order of AAIFR dated 29 January 2008 dismissing the appeal as time-barred is upheld.

Law Points

  • Limitation period for appeal under Section 25 of SICA is mandatory
  • no power to condone delay beyond 45 days
  • Section 5 of Limitation Act not applicable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 447

Writ Petition No.2909 of 2008

2010-01-08

Ferdino I. Rebello, A.R. Joshi

Mr. Praveer Diwan with Mr. Gautam Mehta i/b. Shah & Sanghavi, for the petitioner; Ms. Sapana Rachure i/b. Mr. T.N. Tripathi & Co., for the Respondent No.5; Mr. K. Kandpile with M.S. Bharadwaj for respondent No.1; Ms.Manjusha Badhe with Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.10

Iccon Oil & Specialities Ltd.

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of AAIFR dismissing appeal as time-barred

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the AAIFR order and have the appeal heard on merits

Filing Reason

Appeal before AAIFR was dismissed as barred by limitation

Previous Decisions

BIFR order dated 21 December 2005; AAIFR order dated 29 January 2008 dismissing appeal as time-barred

Issues

Whether the AAIFR has power to condone delay beyond 45 days under Section 25 of SICA

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 5 of Limitation Act applies and delay could be condoned Respondents argued that Section 25 of SICA is mandatory and no power to condone delay beyond 45 days

Ratio Decidendi

The period of 45 days prescribed under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 for filing an appeal before the AAIFR is mandatory and cannot be extended by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appeal filed beyond 45 days is liable to be dismissed as time-barred.

Judgment Excerpts

The order by B.I.F.R. is dated 21st December, 2005. Considering Section 25 of the Act the limitation to prefer an Appeal is within 45 days from the date on which the order is communicated.

Procedural History

BIFR passed order on 21 December 2005. Petitioner filed appeal before AAIFR which was dismissed on 29 January 2008 as time-barred. Petitioner then filed writ petition before Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985: Section 25
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against AAIFR Order Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred Under Section 25 of SICA. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Appeal Under Section 25 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Is Mandatory...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.