Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Possession Dispute. Court Held That Findings of Fact by Trial Court on Prima Facie Case and Possession Cannot Be Interfered With Under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shivaram Narayan Gatkul and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Ejectment Suit — No Prejudice to Plaintiff as Trial Not Commenced. Amendment Sought to Clarify Defence of Tenancy and Possession Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, 1908.

The petitioner, Anilkumar Shrivallabh Sikchi, filed a civil suit against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (respondent no.1) and M/s S.D. Asoriya (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Tenancy Dispute — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Properly Dismissed. Plaint Not Barred by Law as Tenancy Claim Requires Proof, Not Mere Allegation.

The applicant, Blaze Fernandes, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 08.03.2018 of the Civil Judge Jun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...