Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Closure of HAL Airport for Commercial Operations. Concession Agreement for Bangalore International Airport Held Valid and Not Contrary to Public Interest.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) challenging the closure of HAL Airport (Bangalore) for commerc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Initiated in 1965 Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deemed Lapsed as Neither Possession Taken Nor Compensation Paid.

The petitioner, Joaquim Victor Fernandes, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings for his plot No. 34 admeasuring...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...