Search Results for "revision under Article 227"

1381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision in Eviction Suit Based on Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Subsequent Induction of New Tenant in Adjacent Shop Not Relevant as It Was Not Part of Suit Property.

The case involves a suit for eviction filed by the owners (plaintiffs) against the tenants (defendants) in respect of two shops, on the ground of bona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order on Ground of No Service. Failure of Natural Justice and Invalid Service Under Section 32(4) of Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant, a tenant, against the judgment and order dated 13.08.2010 of a learned Single Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Informant's Petition for Additional Charge in Summary Trial Case. Court holds that once charge is framed under Section 211 CrPC, no further charge can be added in a summary trial as per Section 262 CrPC.

The petitioner, Jainab Sayyed Akhtar Ali, the original informant, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...