Search Results for "invalid application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "invalid application"

3892 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3892 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Second Appeal on Conflict Between Civil Court Decree for Possession and Tenancy Declaration Under Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The Second Appeal Arises from Dismissal of Suit for Possession Due to a Declaration of Tenancy Under Section 38E(1) of the Hyderabad Tenancy Act, Which the First Appellate Court Reversed.

7 May 2010

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession of agricultural land. The original plaintiffs (respondent Nos.1 and 2) filed Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Non-Compliance with Notice Requirements Under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act Renders Sale Invalid. DRT and DRAT Orders Upheld, Bank Directed to Follow Statutory Procedure Before Re-auction.

22 Jun 2023

The petitioners, Akola Janata Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Branch Manager/Authorised Officer, challenged the judgment of the Debt Recover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Service of Writ of Summons Without Copy of Plaint Invalid in Commercial Suits Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Time for Filing Written Statement Does Not Run Until Proper Service Effected.

4 Aug 2021

The judgment addresses an interim application by the defendant, Metso India Pvt Ltd, in a commercial suit filed by Atlanta Limited. The core issue was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

13 Jun 2014

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order of the learned Additional Sessions J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

2 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prior Approval Under MCOC Act Against Mother of Accused for Lack of Continuing Unlawful Activity — Pre-Arrest Bail Granted Despite Section 21(3) Embargo. The court held that a single act of purchasing a car after the crime does not constitute 'continuing unlawful activity' under Section 2(1)(d) of MCOC Act, and Section 21(3) does not bar constitutional remedy under Article 226.

28 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a woman, challenged the prior approval granted under Section 23(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation Is a Triable Issue. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments are relevant and if they disclose a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected; limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.

30 Nov -0001

The applicant, Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, who was original defendant No.9 in the suit, filed a Notice of Motion seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Ru...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Land Ceiling Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Revision Application under Section 89A of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 held time-barred and without proper notice.

12 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/S Anchor Daewoo Industries Ltd, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two ord...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Specific Performance Execution, Setting Aside Executing Court's Order Allowing Third-Party Claim Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC. Application Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Held Not Maintainable in Execution for Possession Without Attachment, and Successive Application Barred by Res Judicata.

30 Mar 2026

The appellant, V.M.Tamilselvan, was the plaintiff-decree holder in a suit for specific performance (O.S.No.622 of 2010) based on an agreement of sale ...

99 100 101 102 103

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)