Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1826 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1826 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses First Appellate Court's Dismissal on Limitation and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Time was not of essence of contract and suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 51 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part in Recovery of Possession Case — Appellant Not a Tenant, No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The appellate court's order granting entire damages without separate inquiry under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC set aside, trial court's direction for inquiry restored.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant More, was a former employee of the respondent company, M/s Fixolite Wires & Cables Pvt. Ltd. He was provided with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...