Search Results for "Tribunal error"

4774 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4774 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Reducing Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Multiplier of 13 Applied Instead of 18 for Deceased Aged 48 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Naranbhai Parmar, who died in a vehicular accident on 25.02.2013. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Court Commissioner in Land Dispute Without Issues Being Framed. Appointment of Commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC Held Premature When No Issues Framed and No Evidence Recorded.

The petitioners challenged an interlocutory order dated 26/02/2014 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, J.D., Washi, Dist. Osmanabad, below Exh.18 in RCS ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 18,91,600 with 7.5% Interest Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and son of Kashinath Zanje, who died in a road accident on 21 February 2015. The deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Claimant's Residence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MACT Aurangabad had jurisdiction as claimant resided within its territorial limits, despite accident occurring elsewhere.

The appellant, Navnath s/o Shripati Bhawar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railways Claims Tribunal Dismissal for Non-Joinder of Union of India. Misdescription of Party Held Curable; Claim for Lost Consignment Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.

The appellants, Western Coalfields Ltd., filed a claim before the Railways Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for non-delivery of a consignment of power cables ...