Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

1030 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1030 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Registration of FIR Under Section 175(3) BNSS Against MIDC Employee in Plot Allotment Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind and Not Pass Mechanical Orders Under Section 175(3) BNSS.

The petitioner, Namrata Subhash Pawar, an Assistant in MIDC, challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Prior Use and Reputation. Oral Agreement Claim Fails as Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Exclusive Rights Over 'Puranmal' Mark and Chef Logo.

The plaintiffs, Abhay Agarwal, Ajay Agarwal, and Puranmal Restaurant, a partnership firm based in Dubai, filed a suit against Puranmal Goods Private L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rehears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Robbery After Remand by Supreme Court. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recoveries Challenged Under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The matter originated from the murder of Smt. Chukibai, a 68-year-old pawnbroker residing alone at Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. On 12.05.1991, accused No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Remands Case to High Court for Deciding Vires of Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act. High Court Must Decide Constitutional Challenge on Merits Despite Pending Assessment Proceedings.

The appellant, M/s Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging the constitutional vali...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence did not form complete chain pointing to guilt.

The appellant, Sitaram Laxman Dhoom, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his sister-in-law Pushpa and for causin...