WRIT PETITION NO. 4574 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"
5382 result(s) found
Found 5382 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Shortlisting Criteria for Civil Surgeon Selection. Held that prescribing higher qualification not advertised violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
1 Aug 2014The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 27 January 2014. The Tribunal had ...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Declares MSRTC Circular Denying Alternative Employment to Colour-Blind Drivers as Ultra Vires Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Clause 11 of the impugned circular treating intervening period as leave without pay held contrary to Section 20 of the 2016 Act, which mandates protection of pay and service conditions.
16 Jul 2020The matter involved fourteen writ petitions filed by drivers employed with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). The petitioners w...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim Beyond 90 Days — Condonation of Delay Granted Due to Court Vacations and Lack of Objection. Order 8 Rule 6A CPC does not prescribe a specific period for filing written statement to counterclaim; the period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory.
2 Jul 2010The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.177/2007/A, challenged the order dated 20-8-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior D...
- 91
High Court
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.
6 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.
13 Oct 2011The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...
- 144
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013
6 Jan 2017The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...
- 53
High Court
High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.
7 Oct 2024The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...
- 502
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Pilot License for Violation of Natural Justice — DGCA Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 19(b) Sub-Rule (3) of Aircraft Rules, 1937. License Suspension Without Prior Hearing and Without Recording Reasons Held Illegal.
12 Jun 2013The petitioner, Saurabh P. Lokhande, was issued a Commercial Pilot License by the Republic of Philippines in November 2007. He subsequently applied fo...
- 124
