Search Results for "section 323"

2187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Assault Case Due to Discrepancies in Evidence. Ocular and medical evidence inconsistent; prosecution witnesses turned hostile, leading to acquittal under Sections 324, 323, 504 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Chiplun, dated 18.3.1991, in Regular Criminal Appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Cruelty Case Due to Non-Prosecution. Acquittal of accused under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 read with 34 IPC upheld as complainant failed to appear and State could not show perversity.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Mustaq Ismail Memon and others (respondents-accused) who were tried for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Leave to Appeal in Rape Acquittal Case — Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 506 IPC Upheld Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Maharashtra, through Satara City Police Station, filed an application under Section 378(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking leave t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 323 read with 34 IPC quashed as allegations lacked specific dates and incidents, constituting abuse of process of law.

The applicants, including the mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and other relatives of the informant's husband, filed an application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Direction to Frame Additional Charges Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Evaluating Evidence at Charge-Framing Stage Under Section 216 CrPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which allowed a revision petition filed by the fourth respondent (father-in-law o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...