Search Results for "negative response"

1030 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1030 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Examines Whether Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 Based on Search Material is Permissible Without Invoking Section 153C. Core Legal Question Involves Overriding Effect of Search-Related Special Provisions Over General Reassessment Provisions Under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The group of Special Civil Applications filed before the High Court of Gujarat challenged the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Advisory Opinion Addresses Scope of Governor's and President's Powers Over State Legislation under Articles 200 and 201. Presidential Reference Seeks Clarity on Constitutional Discretion, Time Limits, and Justiciability in Light of Conflicting Judgments.

The President of India, exercising powers under Article 143(1) of the Constitution, referred fourteen questions to the Supreme Court on 13th May 2025,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment.

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Dispute involves multiple hotel management agreements and the applicability of arbitration clauses after partial setting aside of a prior award.

The dispute arises from a series of hotel management agreements concerning a hotel at Lonavala owned by petitioner Laguna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...