Search Results for "management exception"

1342 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1342 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Strict Enforcement of Helmet Law in Public Interest Litigation. Court Orders State to Ensure Compliance with Section 129 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to Reduce Fatal Road Accidents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a public interest litigation filed by Free Legal Aid Cell (NGO) seeking enforcement of the mandatory helmet law unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows PIL Challenging MCI's Rejection of PG Seat Increase Applications for Lack of Consent of Affiliation. The court held that the requirement of Consent of Affiliation is directory and not mandatory, and that the MCI must process the applications on merits.

The Indian Medical Association, Nagpur, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a communication dated 28-12-2012 issued by the Board of Governo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Expulsion of Club Member — Expulsion Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. Member's Defamatory Conduct and Misconduct Justified Expulsion Under Club Bye-laws.

The Plaintiff, Jaisingh Choraria, a member of The National Sports Club of India since 1989, filed a suit challenging his expulsion from the Club. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...