Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1823 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1823 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment notice under Section 13(2).

The appellants, Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil and Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil, were the original plaintiffs in a suit filed before the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by BEST Undertaking Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Lease Termination Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Fortpoint Automotive Private Limited, was allotted a portion of land at Mahim Bus Depot by the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Seeking Full Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA. Petition Challenges Partial Grant of Deemed Conveyance, Excluding Chawl and Access Areas, Citing Incomplete Consideration of Agreements.

The petitioner, a co-operative housing society registered in 1971, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Fresh Eviction Proceedings After Earlier Dismissal Attained Finality — Principle of Res Judicata and Estoppel Applied to Bar Second Eviction on Same Grounds Under Section 120C of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Ashok Bhaurao Sardar, was a tenant of agricultural land owned by respondent no.4, Roopnath Maharaj Sanstha Trust. The Trust initiated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Consent Terms Not Binding on Applicants Under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC. Court holds that applicants who were not parties to consent terms are entitled to restoration of possession or alternative accommodation.

The case involves an appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against an order of a learned single Judge in a Chamber Summons taken out by Responde...