Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

1988 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1988 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Failure to Prove Unlawful Assembly. Conviction Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 323, 427, 452 Read With Section 149 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration and Witness Testimony Found Unreliable.

The case arises from a political rivalry in Aundi village, Solapur district. The appellants, along with others, were tried for forming an unlawful ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.

The judgment dealt with a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the delimitation of wards...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Finds Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Concurrent findings of trial court reversed as plaintiff's claim of ancestral property and possession was not established by evidence.

The case involves two first appeals arising from a common judgment and decree dated 17-02-2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Injunction Suit — Petitioner/Plaintiff Succeeds in Restoring Ex-Parte Decree. Trial Court's Order Allowing Restoration Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance.

The petitioner, Nagireddy, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.10.2017 passed by the 31...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Applications in Revision Against Small Causes Court Order — Negligence of Counsel Not Sufficient Cause for Delay. Applicants Failed to Show Due Diligence in Filing Revision Within Limitation Period Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment pertains to two civil applications filed by the applicants (Bombay Latex & Dispensions Pvt. Ltd. and other Narang group entities) seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...