Search Results for "Distinct offences"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Distinct offences"

1223 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1223 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Secretary in Forgery Case Involving Forged Signatures on Society Documents. Concurrent findings of fact based on expert evidence and witness testimony not interfered with in revision.

15 Mar 2019

The applicant, Pundlik Vishvanath Bangadkar, was the Secretary of Ganesh Shikshan Sanstha, Bhendra. The complainant, Anandrao Wanjari, was the Preside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

1 Mar 2019

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order on detenue while in judicial custody and reliance on a criminal case in which detenue was not involved renders the order illegal.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order promptly and reliance on a case where detenue was not involved vitiates the subjective satisfaction under the MPDA Act.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Brothers for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established as Appellants Acted in Concert with Lethal Weapons.

27 Apr 2005

The appellants, four brothers, were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504 read with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

15 Mar 2005

The petitioner, father of the detenu Shanidas Parshuram Mhatre, challenged the detention order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Inquiry into Custodial Death and Directs Registration of FIR Against Police Personnel. Custodial Violence Alleged Against Deceased Son of Petitioner - Court Orders Inquiry by Chief Judicial Magistrate and Interim Compensation of Rs.50,000.

31 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Smt. Sonabai, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking an inquiry into the death...

High Court

Special Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Securities Scam Case — Prima Facie Case Found Against Accused Under Sections 120B, 420 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conspiracy and Cheating Allegations Supported by Material on Record, Court Refuses to Discharge Accused at Charge Stage.

21 Jul 2006

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) at Mumbai was hearing a case arising from a complaint lodged on 23-3-1993...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Partner and Rebuttal of Presumption. Complainant Partnership Firm Failed to Prove Authority of Signing Partner and that Cheque Was Issued for Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2 Apr 2014

The revision application was filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, through its partner Shri Pandharinath Chafadkar, challenging the j...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

2 Apr 2014

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...

98 99 100 101 102

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)