Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Inquiry into Custodial Death and Directs Registration of FIR Against Police Personnel. Custodial Violence Alleged Against Deceased Son of Petitioner - Court Orders Inquiry by Chief Judicial Magistrate and Interim Compensation of Rs.50,000.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sonabai, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking an inquiry into the death of her son, Pandurang, who died in District Prison, Wardha. She alleged that her son was arrested on 15.5.2002 by Ashti Police Station and was brutally beaten at the time of arrest and in the police station. On 23.5.2002, he was sent to District Prison, Wardha, where he was further tortured and exploited for practice games of police personnel, leading to his death. After his death, the petitioner was called and her signature was obtained on blank paper with an assurance of Rs.25,000 compensation after inquiry. The court, after hearing arguments, found that the allegations raised serious issues of custodial violence and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Wardha, to conduct an inquiry into the cause of death and submit a report within three months. It also directed the police to register an FIR against the concerned police personnel and the jailor. The court further ordered the State to pay interim compensation of Rs.50,000 to the petitioner within four weeks, without prejudice to further compensation based on the inquiry report.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India - Custodial Death - Petitioner sought inquiry into death of her son in police custody and compensation - Court directed inquiry by Chief Judicial Magistrate and registration of FIR against police personnel - Held that custodial violence is a serious violation of fundamental rights (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to an inquiry into the custodial death of her son and compensation for the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Wardha, to conduct an inquiry into the cause of death of Pandurang and submit a report within three months. It also directed the police to register an FIR against the concerned police personnel and the jailor. The State was ordered to pay interim compensation of Rs.50,000 to the petitioner within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Custodial violence
  • Right to life under Article 21
  • Compensation for custodial death
  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (03) 112

Criminal Writ Petition No. 178 of 2004

2006-03-31

J.N. Patel, B.P. Dharmadhikari

Shri O.D. Kakde for petitioner, Shri J.B. Jaiswal, A.P.P. for respondents

Smt. Sonabai wd/o Shivram Waghade

The State of Maharashtra, The Jailor, Central Jail, Wardha, The Police Station Officer, City Police Station, Wardha, The Police Station Officer, Police Station, Ashti

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking inquiry into custodial death and compensation

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought an inquiry into the death of her son in custody, registration of FIR against police personnel, and compensation of Rs.5 lakhs

Filing Reason

Alleged torture and death of petitioner's son in police custody

Issues

Whether the petitioner's son died due to torture in police custody? Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for custodial death?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her son was arrested and beaten mercilessly by police, then tortured in prison, leading to his death. Respondents did not file any counter affidavit and did not dispute the allegations.

Ratio Decidendi

Custodial violence is a serious violation of fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the court can order inquiry and compensation in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has approached this Court invoking its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, seeking a relief in the nature of writ or direction that this Court should order an inquiry into the matter of death of her son... It is the case of the petitioner that her son Pandurang came to be arrested by Police Station, Ashti... and beaten by the police personnel mercilessly and ruthlessly at the time of his arrest and in the police station.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 178 of 2004 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking inquiry and compensation for custodial death. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 31.03.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court "Applicant Acquitted in Bus Accident Case: Conviction Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Rash and Negligent Driving" Court Cites Insufficient Proof of Rashness or Negligence, Discusses Contributory Negligence of the Deceased.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Inquiry into Custodial Death and Directs Registration of FIR Against Police Personnel. Custodial Violence Alleged Against Deceased Son of Petitioner - Court Orders Inquiry by Chief Judicial Magistrate an...