Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Family Settlement Dispute. Court grants status quo order to protect assets pending arbitration under family settlement agreement.

The petitioner, Mukesh J. Shah, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Family Court Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected. Plaint Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Adamsaheb, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 15.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Challenge to Process Issued in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 Cr.P.C. and Time-Barred Debt Raised as Grounds for Quashing.

The matter arose from a private complaint filed by respondent No.1, a proprietary concern, against petitioner No.1 company and its directors/accused p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in SARFAESI Act Suit. Court Holds That Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act Is Not Absolute and Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction to Examine Legality of Proceedings.

The petitioners, Jalgaon Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its authorized officer, challenged an order dated 27.09.2016 passed by the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Restores Trial Court Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell. Delivery of Possession Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance, Entitling Purchaser to Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves two second appeals arising from cross-suits between Dadasaheb Dhondiba Jagtap (appellant) and Anant Shivram Poman (respondent) conce...