Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &
26 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "unauthorized filing"
968 result(s) found
Found 968 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Petition in Excise Duty Evasion Case — No Prima Facie Case for Discharge Established. Petitioner, a German national and director of a distillery, failed to show that the allegations under IPC and PC Act were groundless, as the charge sheet and material disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed.
19 Sep 2019The petitioner, Rakesh Rastogi, a German national and director of M/s. Krimpy Distillery, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Cons...
- 108
High Court
- 175
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Dec 2014The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Failure to Object to Contract Notes Renders Oral Claims Unsupported. The Court held that a client who receives and does not object to timely contract notes for commodity derivatives transactions cannot later claim those transactions were unauthorized, and an arbitral award based solely on oral submissions ignoring such documentary evidence is liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
5 Dec 2014The Petitioner, M/s. Nirmal Bang Commodities Pvt. Ltd., a broker registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 Febru...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against BBMP for Unauthorized Laying of Sewage Line on Private Property Under Section 230 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Court Directs Removal of Pipeline and Restoration of Land, Holding That Municipal Authorities Cannot Enter Private Property Without Consent or Acquisition.
4 Dec 2014The petitioner, Bosch Limited, a company, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Ka...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
2 May 2011The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Petition Against NCDRC Order in Housing Society Dispute — Policy Repudiation Upheld Due to Breach of Condition Regarding Unauthorized Construction. The court held that the insurer was justified in repudiating the claim as the insured failed to disclose material facts about unauthorized construction, which was a fundamental breach of policy conditions.
15 Dec 2025The petitioner, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 4 Decemb...
- 172
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railways' Petition Challenging Tribunal's Conversion of Dismissal to Compulsory Retirement for Unauthorized Absence. The court upheld the tribunal's finding that dismissal was disproportionate under Rule 9 of the Railway Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968, considering the employee's long service.
25 Aug 2016The Union of India, through the Ministry of Railways and South Eastern Railway, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Centra...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.
21 Apr 2026The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...
- 530
