Search Results for "truthfulness verification"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Defamation Process in Companies Act Special Notice Case. The Dispute Involves Allegations Made in a Statutory Notice Under the Companies Act, 2013.

Background: The present writ petition arose from a criminal defamation complaint filed by Respondent No.2, Nusli Neville Wadia, against the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to establish live-link between alleged activities and public order disturbance.

The petitioner challenged a detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) and its subsequent ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Old Incidents Without Proximate Link to Public Order.

The petitioner, Adil Chaus, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, on 30 August 2011 under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Labour Dispute Over Dismissal Without Inquiry. Dismissal based on media reports without independent verification violates natural justice and MSRTC Discipline and Appeal Rules, justifying reinstatement with back wages.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of an employee, a driver with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), following an accident on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insults in Private University Office Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed by the original accused (Dr. Satish Sudhakar Patil, accused no.2, and Vinayak s/o Popat Dhula...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Gum by Forest Officials — Transit Passes Valid and Seizure Without Authority Under Forest Act. Petitioner had valid contract and transit passes for gum collection; seizure at destination without proper authority held illegal.

The petitioner, Arjun Ratansing Jadhav, was the highest bidder in an auction for collection of gum from Chalisgaon forest area for the period 26.11.20...