Search Results for "third party challenge"

3859 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3859 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.

The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA Housing Allotment — Petitioner's Challenge to Eligibility of Allottees Fails. Court holds that MHADA's decision to allot flats to respondents was within its administrative discretion and not arbitrary under Article 226.

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...