Search Results for "tax penalty interest payment"

846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for Concealment of Income in Income Tax Reference. Minimum penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 sustained for suppression of net profit of Rs.9,11,521/-.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings for the Assessment Year 1987-8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Assessment Order and Trade Circular as Ultra Vires Section 6A of CST Act. Inter-State Job Work Movement Not Deemed Sale Under Section 6A Because It Does Not Cover Principal-to-Principal Transactions.

The petitioner, a manufacturer and job worker, received spent catalyst from customers within and outside Maharashtra, processed it, and returned the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Interest Levy in Income Tax Reference - Interest Under Section 217 Not Leviable for Failure to Revise Advance Tax Statement When No Initial Statement Was Required Due to Income Below Threshold Under Section 208(2).

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appella...