Search Results for "substantial breach"

2109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Orders in Section 9 Applications for Injunction in Water Supply Project Dispute. Court Examines Whether Injunction Preventing Contract Termination Amounts to Impermissible Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The matter involved two arbitration appeals arising from interim applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation in Contract Dispute. No Fraud or Special Equities Established to Prevent ONGC from Encashing Bank Guarantees Furnished by Mercator Oil & Gas.

The appellant, Mercator Oil & Gas Limited, had entered into a contract with the first respondent, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...