Search Results for "stock trading"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act for Lack of Patent Illegality. Counterclaim Dismissal Upheld as Reasoned and Within Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion.

The petitioner, M/s. Indiabulls Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Assessing Officer's Order Not Erroneous Under Section 263. Commissioner Cannot Substitute View Where Assessing Officer Applied Mind and Took Plausible View on Depreciation of Current Investments by Bank.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15 January 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in NIFTY Trade Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that petitioners failed to prove unauthorized trade and that credit note was accepted without objection.

The petitioners, Intex Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Mehta, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...