Search Results for "stock exchanges"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Same Material as Original Assessment Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Private Limited, a company engaged in stock broking and proprietary trading, challenged a notice under section 148 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Claim for Unauthorised Transactions in Stock Broker Account. Court upholds arbitral finding that claim was barred by limitation and lacked merit due to acknowledgments of contract notes.

The petitioner, a constituent of the respondent stock broker, filed an arbitration petition challenging an award dated 7th January 2011 that rejected ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Non-Resident Company — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion is Impermissible; Notice and Order Rejecting Objections Set Aside.

The petitioner, Indivest Pte Ltd, a company incorporated in Singapore and wholly owned by the Government of Singapore, filed a writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reopening Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Constitutes Change of Opinion on Same Set of Facts.

The petitioner, Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd., a non-banking financial company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...