Search Results for "shortfall documents"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Minutes of Meeting Converted Force Majeure Clause into Assured Return Mechanism, Interpreting Clauses 3.4.19 and 3.7.2 of Construction Agreement. Appeal Challenges Arbitral Interpretation That State Must Compensate for Any Toll Collection Drop Exceeding 20%.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute concerning a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Case Due to Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Direction to Furnish Document — Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Directing Supply of Letter Dated 20.01.2001 Was Final and Could Not Be Modified Without Proper Justification.

The appellant, a manufacturer of cotton yarn and polyester yarn, was issued two show cause notices dated 11.05.2001 and 02.11.2001 alleging excess sto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award for Squaring Off Due to Margin Default. Member-Client Agreement and Electronic Contract Notes Establish Liability for Margin Shortfall Under Byelaws of Stock Exchange.

The petitioner, Sizarali M. Dodhia, a constituent of the respondent, Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., entered into a member-client agreement on 21 Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...