Search Results for "revision against conviction"

932 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 932 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted as Loan Advanced in 2010, Cheque Issued in 2012, Debt Not Legally Enforceable.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Gundu Sidray Birje, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Seeking Set-Off of Pre-Conviction Detention Against Sentence in Theft Case. Petitioners' claim for set-off under Section 428 CrPC rejected as they were in judicial custody in a different case during the relevant period.

The petitioners, accused in C.C.No.575/2015 for offences under Sections 457, 380 read with 34 IPC, were convicted and sentenced by the trial court on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act. The court confirmed that the accused's defence of a blank cheque was not credible and that the complainant had proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, C. Niranjan Yadav, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Appeal in NDPS Act Case — Conviction for Possession of Ganja Upheld. Court holds that compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act is not mandatory when search is of a vehicle and not of a person.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Petition filed by the accused (Lakshmana Reddy and Venkatarao) and a Criminal Appeal filed by the State of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Bombay Police Act for Possession of Stolen Property — Recovery Based on Co-accused's Disclosure Statement Not Admissible Against Petitioner Under Section 27 of Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Satish Shivajirao Deshmukh, a jeweller, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nanded, under Section 411 of the Indian ...