Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

593 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Daily Wager by Counting Entire Service from Initial Appointment. Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Rule 3(8) of Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002 When Followed by Regularization.

27 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Bhathibhai Valambhai Baria, was initially appointed as a daily wager on 01.06.2002 by the respondents (State of Gujarat and its author...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Deduction from Gratuity for Cooperative Loan Repayment. Employer Cannot Deduct Gratuity for Loan to Cooperative Society Unless It Is a Government Due Under Rule 132 read with Rule 134 of Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982.

23 Dec 2013

The appellant, Ashfaq Husain, was a Section Officer with Zilla Parishad, Washim. Upon his retirement, the respondents (Chief Executive Officer, Block ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Employee Seeking Modification of Annuity Option Under Post-Retirement Benefit Scheme. Option Once Exercised Under Super Annuation Benefit Fund Scheme Cannot Be Changed After Retirement, as It Would Affect Contractual Rights of Corporation and LIC.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Avinash Trimbak Namjoshi, was an employee of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Respondent No.1) who joined on 22nd June 1966 and opted for ...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Retirement Benefits by Directing Consideration of Fresh Representation by Municipality. Sanitary Worker's Claim for Gratuity and Pension from Rajapalayam Municipality Not Decided on Merits; Court Directs 4th Respondent to Pass Reasoned Order Within Six Weeks as Per Article 226.

6 Feb 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Thimmi, a former sanitary worker of Rajapalayam Municipality, seeking a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Dismissed Bank Officer Seeking Gratuity — Forfeiture Upheld Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Misconduct Causing Financial Loss. The court held that forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is valid when dismissal is for misconduct causing financial loss to the employer.

16 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Kishanrao Vithalrao Bagale, was a dismissed officer employee of Bank of Baroda. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Full Retirement Benefits to Retired Employee. Retirement Benefits Constitute Property Under Article 300A of Constitution of India, Cannot Be Withheld Without Legal Authority.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Shri Babulal Fakira Vasaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Option to Voluntary Retiree in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Case — Regulation 18 of Pension Regulations Applies for Eligibility, Not Just Calculation. The court held that the bank's communication denying pension eligibility under Regulation 18 was erroneous and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's pension option.

21 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vandana w/o Eknath Bhondwe, a retired employee of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (now State Bank of India), filed a writ petition chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Order — Employer Held Liable for Full Gratuity Despite Employee's Transfer to Another Corporation. Lien Maintained with Original Employer During Transfer, Making It the 'Employer' Under Section 2(f) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

10 Oct 2023

The Petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misappropriation by Bank Employee — Wilful Misconduct Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Justifies Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity. The court held that misappropriation of funds by a bank employee constitutes wilful misconduct involving moral turpitude, and the employer is entitled to forfeit the entire gratuity under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

14 Jun 2018

The petitioner, an ex-employee of the respondent bank, was terminated on 6 July 1996 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)