Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Charge-Sheet Issued Under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules Two Days Before Retirement. Department's 13-year delay in initiating proceedings and subsequent acquittal in criminal case on same facts raised questions of law.

The petitioner, a member of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) recruited in 1979, was working as Additional Commissioner of Custo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Widow Against Recovery of Excess Payment from Deceased Employee's Pension. Recovery from Legal Heirs Based on Employee's Undertaking Held Impermissible as Excess Payment Was Due to Employer's Mistake Without Misrepresentation.

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha wd/o Bhagirath Meshram, is the widow of a deceased employee who worked as a Junior Lecturer at Zilla Parishad High School. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Issued on Retirement Day for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Departmental Action Initiated After Superannuation Without Pending Proceedings or Pension Disallowance Is Barred by Service Rules.

The petitioner, Narendra K. Kumbhare, was employed with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. from 24.04.1985 as a Typist and was promoted over the years, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Employee in Kadamba Transport Corporation Case — Retirement Held Punitive Without Inquiry. Resolution No. 71 of 2007 Set Aside as Board Failed to Record Satisfaction of Inefficiency Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Mahesh Prabhakar Kamat, was appointed as Accountant in the Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited on 13 December 1982. He was promoted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs Release of Leave Encashment to Retired Employee in Service Benefits Dispute. Leave encashment ordered to be paid within eight weeks, with liberty to seek other benefits after pending related petitions are adjudicated.

The petitioner, Dhirendra S/o Kanjibhai Unagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Zilla Parishad Employees Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay. Recovery Orders Quashed as Employees Did Not Play Fraud and Undertakings Were Coercively Extracted at Retirement.

The petitioners were retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Nashik, who had superannuated between 2018 and 2023. They had been paid revised pay scal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Interest on Delayed Retirement Benefits — Petitioner Entitled to 6% Interest on Withheld Amount. Court Held That Withholding of Benefits Due to Pending Civil Suit Does Not Justify Denial of Interest for the Period of Delay.

The petitioner, Sri Shivananjappa, was an employee of ITI Limited, Bengaluru, who rendered service from 26.11.1975 until 30.11.2003, when he voluntari...