Search Results for "preventive detention"

710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical Reproduction of Police Report Without Independent Satisfaction by District Magistrate.

The petitioner, Anant Manikrao Kachale, an agriculturist from Vaitagwadi, Parbhani, challenged his preventive detention order dated 24-08-2017 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Discrepancy in Dates. Discrepancy between date of detention order (02/02/2012) and grounds of detention (03/02/2012) shows subjective satisfaction recorded after order, vitiating detention.

The petitioner, Iqbal Sikandar Pathan, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Anticipatory Bail in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Ganja. Custodial Interrogation Necessary When Recovery Exceeds Commercial Quantity and Accused Is Named in Statements of Co-Accused.

The petitioner, Haridas Shankar Gaikwad, aged 52 years, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sectio...