Search Results for "ordinances"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Reservation Promotion Rule. Rule 3 of Maharashtra Public Services (Reservation) Rules, 2017 Held Ultra Vires for Non-Compliance with Article 16(4A) Conditions.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, and the Director, Higher Education, filed two writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Professor's Petition Challenging Chancellor's Order Voiding Nomination to Board of Studies in Maharashtra Public Universities Act Case. Nomination Under Section 40(2)(b)(ii) Held Valid as Petitioner is a 'Teacher' Under Section 2(44) of the Act.

The petitioner, Dr. Shankar Bhagwan Ambhore, a Professor and Head of Department in Economics at Smt. Dankunwar Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Jalna, was nomina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Premature Retirement of Lecturer at Age 58 Instead of 60 Years. Government Resolutions Prescribing Retirement Age of 60 Years for Teachers in Non-Government Colleges Are Binding on Private Unaided Institutions.

The petitioner, Professor Smt. Manorama Prakash Khandekar, was appointed as a Lecturer at Priyadarshani College of Education, Nagpur, on 06.10.2003, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Vice-Principal Despite Lack of Prior Approval from University. Prior Approval Requirement Under Ordinance XVIII Not Absolute Where Past Practice Shows Post-Facto Approvals Were Granted.

The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 09.05.2019, which upheld the order of the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...