Search Results for "open competition"

542 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Equal Passing Criteria for Project Affected Persons in Government Recruitment -- Petitioner's Claim for Separate Treatment Under PAP Category Rejected

The Petitioner, a Project Affected Person, sought appointment in Group C cadre under the Project Affected Persons category after failing a recruitment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Legality of Termination of Backdoor Appointments in Nagpur Municipal Corporation. Court Considers Earlier Inquiry Report Finding Bogus Selections and Directs Action Against Irregular Appointments.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by twelve former employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, whose serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010218752018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Resolution Granting Letter of Intent for New Colleges, Holds State's Discretion Under Section 109(3)(d) of Maharashtra Public Universities Act Must Be Non-Arbitrary. Refusal Based on Extraneous Factors Like Age of Institution Violates Article 14 of Constitution.

The matter pertained to the establishment of a new college in Taluka-Haveli, Pune, under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 1960. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...