Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for New Junior College Science Division Due to Non-Compliance with Government Policy and Lack of Need Assessment. Permission granted without considering existing facility and without following prescribed procedure under Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 50
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Annapurnadevi Vidya Prasarak Sanstha, a registered trust running a primary and secondary school and a junior and senior college at Thalner in Shirpur Tahsil, challenged the permission granted by the State Government to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 (Kisan Vidya Prasarak Sanstha and its college) to start a Junior College with Science faculty. The petitioner had been granted permission in 2006 to start science faculty in its junior college with 100% grant, and the course was running smoothly with over 90 students. In 2011-12, respondent No. 5 submitted a proposal for permission to start science faculty. The petitioner objected, arguing that there was no need for another science faculty in the same village and that the permission would adversely affect its existing institution. The State Government granted permission on 22.1.2013 without considering the petitioner's objections and without following the prescribed procedure under the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 and the relevant government resolutions. The High Court held that the permission was illegal and arbitrary, as the government failed to assess the need and consider the existing facility. The court quashed the permission and directed the respondents to follow the proper procedure if they wished to apply afresh. The decision was in favor of the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Grant of Permission to Start New Educational Institution - Need Assessment - The State Government granted permission to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start a Junior College with Science faculty without assessing the need and without considering the existing facility run by the petitioner in the same village. Held that such permission is illegal and liable to be quashed as it violates the government policy and the principles of natural justice. (Paras 2-8)

B) Education Law - Compliance with Government Policy - Mandatory Procedure - The permission was granted without following the prescribed procedure under the Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 and the government resolutions. Held that the permission is invalid as it was granted without proper application of mind and without considering the objections of the petitioner. (Paras 4-7)

C) Education Law - Right to Establish Educational Institution - Reasonable Restrictions - While the right to establish educational institution is protected under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, it is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of the general public. Held that the permission granted without following the policy is arbitrary and violative of Article 14. (Paras 2, 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the permission granted by the State Government to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start a Junior College with Science faculty at Thalner is legal and valid, considering the existing facility run by the petitioner and the compliance with government policy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the permission granted on 22.1.2013 to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start Junior College with Science faculty. The court directed that if the respondents wish to apply afresh, the government shall consider the application in accordance with law and policy.

Law Points

  • Government policy for granting permission to start new educational institutions must be strictly followed
  • need assessment is mandatory
  • existing facilities must be considered
  • permission cannot be granted without following prescribed procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (03) 26

Writ Petition No. 5139 of 2013

2018-03-06

T.V. Nalawade, K.L. Wadane

Mr. P.S. Dighe for petitioner, Mr. R.V. Dasalkar for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Mr. V.D. Sapkal for respondent Nos. 5 & 6

Annapurnadevi Vidya Prasarak Sanstha Thalner, Through its President Sharadchandra Pitambar Wadile

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Secondary), The Kisan Vidya Prasarak Sanstha, Shri Sant Gadge Maharaj Vidyalaya & Smt. D.T. Pawar, Junior College

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 226 of Constitution of India challenging the permission granted by the State Government to start a Junior College with Science faculty.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside the permission granted on 22.1.2013 to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start Junior College, 11th Standard Science, and preventing the Government from giving such permission.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, an existing educational institution running science faculty, contended that the permission was illegal as it was granted without assessing need and without following government policy.

Issues

Whether the permission granted to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start a Junior College with Science faculty is legal and valid? Whether the State Government followed the prescribed procedure and policy while granting such permission?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that it already runs a science faculty with 100% grant and sufficient students, and opening another science faculty in the same village would adversely affect its institution. Petitioner contended that the permission was granted without considering its objections and without following the government policy. Respondents argued that the permission was granted as per the policy and there was need for another institution.

Ratio Decidendi

The permission granted by the State Government to start a new educational institution without assessing the need and without considering the existing facility is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The government must follow the prescribed procedure and policy before granting such permission.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is filed under Articles 14, 19 (1)(g) and 226 of Constitution of India for relief of quashing and setting aside the permission granted by respondent No. 1, the State to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to start the Junior College, 11th Standard Science. It is contended that the permission granted on 22.1.2013 is illegal. The State Government granted permission to petitioner to start science faculty in junior college of petitioner in the year 2006 and 100% grant was also made available for that division. It is contended that as there was such facility in the village and opening of another junior college for the same faculty would have created...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5139 of 2013 before the High Court of Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the permission granted on 22.1.2013. The court issued rule and heard both sides for final disposal by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 226
  • Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Unabsorbed Depreciation Set-off Against Section 69 Addition Upheld. Addition of Unaccounted Stock Treated as Business Income Under Section 32(2) of Income-Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Implead Third Party in Arbitration — Section 37(2)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Encompass Orders on Impleadment. Denial of impleadment of a third party as a veritable pa...