Search Results for "non-application of mind"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "non-application of mind"

443 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's representation before confirming detention and that vague grounds violate Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Shri Sujit Suresh Menpal, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 7/10/2005 under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act, 1986 — Disqualification Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Application of Mind. The court held that the disqualification authority must apply its mind to the allegations and evidence, and pass a reasoned order; mere reproduction of complaint and absence of finding on voluntary giving up of membership renders the order invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Ratnamala Ashokrao Shinde (Sarpanch) and Bandu Raghunath Panchlinge (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Palodi, were disqualified by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Representation Not Considered Before Confirmation. Failure to Consider Representation Before Confirmation Under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA Renders Detention Invalid.

4 Aug 2006

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2.4.2004 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Visa Extension Rejection for Yemeni National Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. The court directed reconsideration of visa extension application considering force majeure and medical reasons.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioner, a Yemeni national, came to India in 2013 on a student visa valid until 06-08-2014. He could not complete his studies due to language b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Detenu's History of Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Preventive Detention When Bail Was Granted in Most Cases and No Material Shows Inadequacy of Regular Law.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiulla, father of the detenu Roshan Jameer @ Jameer @ Jammu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Const...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of Executive Engineer in KRIDL Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Suspension order set aside as it was passed mechanically without considering the employee's explanation and without recording reasons as required under Rule 3(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966.

8 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Sri. Zaranappa Chincholikar, an Executive Engineer with Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL), challenged an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Detenu's Exoneration in Adjudication Proceedings Not Considered by Detaining Authority, Rendering Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

6 Jul 2006

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Bherchand Tikaji Bora, challenged an order of detention dated 27th August 1998 passed under Section 3(1) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the possibility of the detenu being released on bail and the impact of existing bail orders when passing a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

23 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mhaisarali Ramzanali Khan, challenged an order of detention dated 21 April 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Rejecting Caste Claim Due to Non-Application of Mind on Affinity Test. Caste Certificate Verification Requires Independent Assessment of Affinity Test, Not Mere Reliance on Research Officer's Observation.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Ashwini Anil Chavan, was issued a caste certificate on 25 March 2003 certifying her as belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe. Upon v...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)