Search Results for "missing child"

467 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 467 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder, Kidnapping, and Unnatural Offense Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and recovery of body at instance of accused sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 363, 377, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vaibhav Shantaram More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 363, 377, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Grandmother's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Sets Aside High Court's Habeas Corpus Order. Father's Voluntary Handover of Child to Grandmother and Affidavit Appointing Her as Guardian Renders Custody Not Illegal, Requiring Remedy Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The present appeal arises from a custody dispute over a minor child, Garvit, born on 5th July 2015 to Dr. Kulwant Singh (respondent-father) and Sangee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder of Two Daughters Based on Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Bodies. Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Recovery at Accused’s Instance Deemed Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Mahesh Jagan Surti, by the Sessions Judge, Daman, under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete. Illicit Relationship Motive Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC When Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Weapon Are Unreliable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rajendra Manohar Ghadigaonkar (respondent-accused) in Sessions Case No.16 of 2001 for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Raju @ Rakesh Dhaniram Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences punishable under Section 364-A (kidna...