Search Results for "managerial capacity"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Maharashtra Police Academy Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as the petitioner is not an 'industry' under the Act.

The present Writ Petition was filed by the Maharashtra Police Academy (Petitioner) challenging the Judgment dated 09.02.2025 passed by the Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Restraint on Termination Without Due Process and Seven Days' Notice for Transfer Upheld. Industrial Court's Order Under MRTU & PULP Act Found Not Perverse or Jurisdictionally Erroneous.

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19 September 2022 passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Educational Society Against Labour Court Orders Granting Compensation to Workman. Employer's failure to prove abandonment of service and non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 leads to reinstatement with back wages.

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and its affiliated college, C.B. Kore Polytechnic, filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Industrial Court Order for Failure to Frame Preliminary Issue on Workman Status. Employer's Application to Decide Whether Complainant is a Workman Under MRTU & PULP Act Must Be Considered as Preliminary Issue.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Marayadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 10th March 2010 passed by the learn...